Comments for AkillesBlog http://blog.akilles.org Talk on programming, computers, electronics, web etc Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:38:30 +0200 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on VLC Media Player – adding to Default Programs list in Windows 7 by Default Programs in Windows 7 - adding program to program list | AkillesBlog http://blog.akilles.org/2010/06/13/vlc-media-player-as-default-for-all-supported-file-types-in-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-12029 Default Programs in Windows 7 - adding program to program list | AkillesBlog Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:38:30 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=89#comment-12029 [...] on programming, computers, electronics, web etc « Installing Emacs Muse on Windows XP VLC Media Player as default for all supported file types in Windows 7 [...] [...] on programming, computers, electronics, web etc « Installing Emacs Muse on Windows XP VLC Media Player as default for all supported file types in Windows 7 [...]

]]> Comment on Default Programs in Windows 7 – adding program to list of programs by Setting VLC Media Player as default for all supported file types in Windows 7 | AkillesBlog http://blog.akilles.org/2010/06/13/default-programs-in-windows-7-adding-program-to-list-of-programs/comment-page-1/#comment-12028 Setting VLC Media Player as default for all supported file types in Windows 7 | AkillesBlog Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:34:49 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=71#comment-12028 [...] AkillesBlog Talk on programming, computers, electronics, web etc « Default Programs in Windows 7 – adding program to list of programs [...] [...] AkillesBlog Talk on programming, computers, electronics, web etc « Default Programs in Windows 7 – adding program to list of programs [...]

]]> Comment on Ruby on Rails: Experimenting with ActiveScaffold by Rob http://blog.akilles.org/2008/04/17/ruby-on-rails-experimenting-with-activescaffold/comment-page-1/#comment-8988 Rob Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:37:49 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=61#comment-8988 A year and a half after publication and exactly what I was looking for. I now can calculate fields and place them in a virtual column! This is exactly the kind of documentation/example that belongs in the AS site! Thanks! A year and a half after publication and exactly what I was looking for. I now can calculate fields and place them in a virtual column! This is exactly the kind of documentation/example that belongs in the AS site!

Thanks!

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Ziggie http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-2924 Ziggie Tue, 27 Jan 2009 06:18:21 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-2924 The stupid Rock & Roll Wheel just quit working on my Colorado 300, worked fine yesterday, now works only sporadically, I think this Colorado 300 is just a junk, as far as the hardware/ software is concerned, sorry I ever looked at it. Ziggie The stupid Rock & Roll Wheel just quit working on my Colorado 300, worked fine yesterday, now works only sporadically,
I think this Colorado 300 is just a junk, as far as the hardware/ software is concerned, sorry I ever looked at it.

Ziggie

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Riaan http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-1897 Riaan Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:09:29 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-1897 I am interested in the Colorado. Please watch this youtube clip and give me feedback: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJyt3RFycsE&feature=related I am particularly concerned about the following 2 issues: 1. They say that your position is updated to slowly, making it hard to navigate on foot. Apparently the GPS position calculation is very accurate, but in this video the field journalist using it could not navigate due to the mentioned problem. Please comment on this. 2. With the etrex series you were able to move the cursor around in the map mode with the coordinates of the cursors position displayed the whole time you move it around on the map. This way you could quickly match up the coordinates to a point that you are interested in, mark that point and goto it. According to the review in the above video the field journalist did not use such a function on the colorado. I thought that the colorado would have that function as an option. I know you can move a cursor around on the map, but can it be configured to display the coordinates of the position that the cursor is pointing at while moving the cursor around? Please send all opinions and info to riaanpilot@hotmail.com. Any advice will be greatly appreciated! I am interested in the Colorado. Please watch this youtube clip and

give me feedback:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJyt3RFycsE&feature=related

I am particularly concerned about the following 2 issues:
1. They say that your position is updated to slowly, making it hard to navigate on foot. Apparently the GPS position calculation is very accurate, but in this video the field journalist using it could not navigate due to the mentioned problem.
Please comment on this.

2. With the etrex series you were able to move the cursor around in the map mode with the coordinates of the cursors position displayed the whole time you move it around on the map. This way you could quickly match up the coordinates to a point that you are interested in, mark that point and goto it. According to the review in the above video the
field journalist did not use such a function on the colorado. I thought that the colorado would have that function as an option. I know you can move a cursor around on the map, but can it be configured to display the coordinates of the position that the cursor is pointing at while moving the cursor around?

Please send all opinions and info to riaanpilot@hotmail.com.
Any advice will be greatly appreciated!

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Thomas http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-1701 Thomas Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:19:57 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-1701 Hi, With regards to the Colorado 300. Is there a "find street address" (when navigating city streets) option on the Colorado 300. As I understand, this option allows you to navigate to a particular address like a In Car GPS. I'm pretty sure the GPS60csx has this option (as per the manual) but could not find this option in the Colorado manual Hi,
With regards to the Colorado 300. Is there a “find street address” (when navigating city streets) option on the Colorado 300. As I understand, this option allows you to navigate to a particular address like a In Car GPS. I’m pretty sure the GPS60csx has this option (as per the manual) but could not find this option in the Colorado manual

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Christian http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-515 Christian Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:57:33 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-515 @Edu: Hmm, it depends on your preferences. Self, I love the extra pixels I get from the Colorado 300 compared to the 60CS(x), because it makes it easier to get a wider overview while still seeing the details. This makes the Colorado 300 my choice for hiking. However, the pixels are smaller on the Colorado than on the 60CS(x), so if I had to wear glasses to see things up close, I'd rather go with the 60CSx. Also, if you're gonna put your unit on your bike's handlebars and see the details while riding, go with the one with larger pixels. Also, take into account what's being said about the battery capacity above. @Edu:

Hmm, it depends on your preferences.

Self, I love the extra pixels I get from the Colorado 300 compared to the 60CS(x), because it makes it easier to get a wider overview while still seeing the details. This makes the Colorado 300 my choice for hiking.

However, the pixels are smaller on the Colorado than on the 60CS(x), so if I had to wear glasses to see things up close, I’d rather go with the 60CSx. Also, if you’re gonna put your unit on your bike’s handlebars and see the details while riding, go with the one with larger pixels.

Also, take into account what’s being said about the battery capacity above.

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Edu http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-514 Edu Tue, 02 Sep 2008 19:46:35 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-514 Hi, I am looking to get a new GPS(hiking) and can you recomended one, please Colorado 300, Oregon 300 or 60CSx. ?????? Thanks Edu ealcaniz@gmail.com Hi, I am looking to get a new GPS(hiking) and can you recomended one, please
Colorado 300, Oregon 300 or 60CSx. ??????

Thanks
Edu
ealcaniz@gmail.com

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Christian http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-339 Christian Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:48:10 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-339 Yes, I've noticed that it lasts significantly shorter than the 60CS too. However, I think it lasts longer on rechargeable NiMH than on alkaline batteries. The drawback with the rechargeables, though, is that they auto-decharge 1% or so each day you carry them in your backpack on the hike... :-/ Yes, I’ve noticed that it lasts significantly shorter than the 60CS too. However, I think it lasts longer on rechargeable NiMH than on alkaline batteries. The drawback with the rechargeables, though, is that they auto-decharge 1% or so each day you carry them in your backpack on the hike… :-/

]]> Comment on New Garmin Colorado 300 vs old Garmin 60CS : First impressions review by Torgrim Rygnestad http://blog.akilles.org/2008/02/29/first-impressions-garmin-colorado-300-vs-garmin-60cs/comment-page-1/#comment-337 Torgrim Rygnestad Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:27:34 +0000 http://blog.akilles.org/?p=4#comment-337 Hi. Did anyone notice that the battery-life is very very short. For me they last about 5-6 hours on my hike up in the mountains. I not used the gps much during the days, just a look now and then and no "playing" around. A CS60 that my buddy bring not have to get new batteries during this week, 5 days hike. I returned mine, make no sense to bring tons of batteries on a hike. btw...batteries I use is Duracell. Torgrim Hi.
Did anyone notice that the battery-life is very very short. For me they last about 5-6 hours on my hike up in the mountains. I not used the gps much during the days, just a look now and then and no “playing” around.
A CS60 that my buddy bring not have to get new batteries during this week, 5 days hike.
I returned mine, make no sense to bring tons of batteries on a hike.
btw…batteries I use is Duracell.

Torgrim

]]>